Opinion: Why value-added evaluations are unreliable

09/23/2010 | TIME (subscription required)

A writer and partner at an education nonprofit questions the reliability of value-added teacher evaluations. Andrew J. Rotherham writes that the method is flawed because of inadequate tests and incomplete data. He suggests better training for administrators and a new method for evaluating teachers that relies on the value-added analysis, along with classroom observations and other data.

View Full Article in:

TIME (subscription required)

Published in Brief:

SmartBrief Job Listings for Education

Job Title Company Location
Teacher Leadership Innovation (TLI) Leadership Coach
Leading Educators
Washington D.C., DC
Instructional Designer, ESL
Imagine Learning, Inc.
Provo, UT
District Superintendent
Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA)
Seoul
Sr. Product Manager - Professional Development
NWEA
Nationwide, SL_Nationwide
Partner - Strategy, Systems and Policy
TNTP
Nationwide, SL_Nationwide