Opinion: Why value-added evaluations are unreliable

09/23/2010 | TIME (subscription required)

A writer and partner at an education nonprofit questions the reliability of value-added teacher evaluations. Andrew J. Rotherham writes that the method is flawed because of inadequate tests and incomplete data. He suggests better training for administrators and a new method for evaluating teachers that relies on the value-added analysis, along with classroom observations and other data.

View Full Article in:

TIME (subscription required)

Published in Brief:

SmartBrief Job Listings for Education

Job Title Company Location
Consultant - Los Angeles, CA (Full-time)
Insight Education Group
Encino, CA
Senior Turnaround Consultant (Job ID: 8274)
American Institutes of Research
Chicago, IL
Principal
Visible Men Academy
Bradenton, FL
Director, Department of Defense Dependents Schools, Europe
Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA)
Sembach
Senior Researcher\/Technical Assistance Consultant (8264)
American Institutes for Research
Washington, DC