Paper logs pose significant risks to modern food and beverage manufacturers. They are fragile, easily lost or even destroyed through disasters or human error. Relying on individual staff members makes collaboration and visibility difficult, while illegible handwriting or inconsistent formatting can hinder interpretation, according to Matt Brown, CEO of food and beverage software development company Wherefour. As companies scale, paper records become bulky and impractical to manage or share, especially during audits or regulatory reviews, increasing operational and compliance vulnerabilities.
“Digital records offer real-time visibility, allowing multiple users to enter, review and monitor data simultaneously, which improves accuracy and accountability,” Brown says.
Here, Brown discusses how digital frameworks are key – not only for business resilience, but also for compliance with the Safe Quality Food certification program and the Food Safety Modernization Act.
We know that disasters such as hurricanes and wildfires can completely wipe out a company’s physical records. How does a digital framework serve as a critical layer of business protection beyond just simple record-keeping?
A well-designed digital framework provides resilience that paper systems simply cannot. Digital records offer real-time visibility, allowing multiple users to enter, review and monitor data simultaneously, which improves accuracy and accountability.
Backups can be automated and stored securely across multiple locations, ensuring records remain accessible even when physical facilities are compromised. Just as importantly, strong traceability systems preserve data integrity by preventing historical records from being altered, creating a safeguard against both unintentional errors and malicious activity.
By removing the requirement for teams to be physically co-located, digital systems also expand the available talent pool and enable flexible staffing models, including remote and back-office support, an increasingly important advantage for growing manufacturers.
You have described Wherefour as a “tool in a tool set” for Safe Quality Food certification success. How does digitizing inventory and traceability make SQF certification easier?
Digitizing inventory and traceability embeds SQF principles directly into daily operations rather than treating them as a separate compliance exercise.
Training teams on a traceability system naturally reinforces SQF standards and best practices, helping staff understand not just what is required, but why. Mock recalls and real recall scenarios can be executed quickly and confidently, which is critical during both certification and ongoing audits.
Digital tools also make it easy to simulate inspections or reset scenarios for practice, allowing teams to prepare without disrupting operations. Over time, manufacturers benefit from an ecosystem effect as well. Working within systems that are familiar to SQF consultants and certified professionals makes it easier to ask questions, validate processes, and get informed guidance when needed.
What’s your advice for leaders shifting to a digital-first culture?
Successful digital transformation starts with clarity around the end goal. Leaders should define what “good” looks like and work backward, breaking the journey into manageable stages.
Moving from paper to digital is rarely instantaneous, and expecting overnight adoption often creates resistance. So, it’s important to meet teams where they are, understanding their comfort level with technology and pacing change accordingly.
Investing in basic technology awareness and training can make a significant difference in confidence and adoption. Also, transparency with vendors matters. Being honest about internal capabilities allows a strong partner to support the team effectively, knowing when to push progress forward and when to slow down to ensure long-term success.
How can AI reduce friction and support compliance teams without replacing essential human oversight?
AI is most effective when it removes friction rather than responsibility. When properly trained, AI tools can take on repetitive or time-consuming tasks, freeing compliance teams to focus on higher-value work. AI is also exceptionally fast at synthesizing large volumes of data into usable summaries, creating meaningful time savings that can be redirected toward process improvement and risk management.
That said, AI remains a support tool, not a replacement for human judgment. It lacks contextual understanding of a company’s specific operations, culture and regulatory nuances. Human oversight is still essential to interpret results, make informed decisions and apply real-world experience that technology alone cannot replicate.
Beyond SQF, manufacturers are also facing tighter FSMA traceability requirements. How does a cloud-based ERP help teams meet evolving FSMA traceability requirements?
Cloud-based ERP systems provide a centralized, authoritative source of truth across the organization, which is foundational for meeting modern traceability requirements.
Instead of piecing together data from spreadsheets and paper logs, teams can access consistent, real-time information across inventory, production and compliance, from any location. The delayed FSMA timeline has given manufacturers a valuable opportunity to implement these systems thoughtfully, developing stronger processes organically rather than reacting under deadline pressure.
Companies that use this time to modernize are better positioned not only for compliance but for long-term operational efficiency.
What are the core components of a system that allow a manufacturer to feel confident in their records at any given moment?
An audit-ready system enforces discipline without creating friction. It should embed best practices for material traceability directly into workflows and reinforce the organization’s standard operating procedures through consistent processes.
Guardrails are equally important. Systems should prevent inexperienced users from taking actions they are not trained or authorized to perform. At the same time, compliance leaders need fast, intuitive access to the data required for audits, recalls and certifications.
When these elements work together, audit readiness becomes a natural state rather than a last-minute scramble.
Where should manufacturers start when moving from paper to digital?
The most effective starting point is listening. Leaders should survey their teams to understand technical comfort levels and identify pain points in existing processes.
Asking employees what slows them down or what they wish could be improved often surfaces the clearest opportunities for impact. This input helps shape a transition plan that is realistic, inclusive and aligned with both operational needs and team readiness, setting the foundation for a successful move toward digital compliance.
Related stories:
- Three companies looking to transform the grocery techology landscape
- FMI Midwinter 2026: AI and collaboration make center stage
- Who is really using grocery technology
If you liked this article, sign up to receive one of SmartBrief’s Food & Beverage newsletters. They are among SmartBrief’s more than 250 industry-focused newsletters.