Navigating politics at work can often feel like walking through a minefield — everyone has opinions, but not everyone has the finesse to handle them without creating bad feelings. In an era where political polarization seeps into every aspect of life, including the workplace, leaders are grappling with a dilemma: should they attempt to shut down political discussions completely, or is there a more nuanced approach?
Attempting to stifle political discourse in the workplace, particularly during an election year, is not only impractical but also counterproductive. Research from Harvard Business Review underscores the pitfalls of such an approach, revealing that suppressing political conversations can lead to heightened frustration and disengagement among employees. When companies try to quell political debates, they often do so at the cost of increased turnover and diminished job satisfaction. The 2020 election cycle served as a case study of this phenomenon. Organizations that embraced open, respectful dialogue found themselves reaping the rewards of improved team cohesion and a more inclusive culture. In contrast, those who enforced a strict silence on political matters frequently encountered hidden tensions and reduced trust among their workforce.
Introducing the practice of eunoia
Late in the 4th century BCE, the Greek philosopher Aristotle introduced the world to the notion of eunoia, and it’s a remarkably valuable concept that remains largely unknown to the general public. The direct translation is “beautiful thinking,” but it more accurately refers to the favorable disposition or goodwill a speaker cultivates with their audience. At its core, eunoia involves demonstrating to an audience that the speaker has the listener’s best interests in mind. This creates trust and rapport, making the audience more receptive to one’s arguments or ideas. It’s the speaker showing they are sincere, empathetic, and aligned with the values and concerns of their listeners.
This is neither flattery nor pandering. Eunoia isn’t about avoiding difficult conversations or sanitizing one’s views; it’s about approaching contentious discussions with a mindset grounded in mutual respect and empathy. It’s about transforming potentially divisive dialogues into opportunities for deeper understanding and connection. Instead of restricting or outright banning political discourse in the workplace, promoting and developing eunoia in those discussions can be transformational.
Imagine a workplace where political discussions are not met with hostility but are instead seen as a chance to bridge divides and enhance relationships. This is the essence of eunoia in action. The power of this approach lies in its ability to reframe political conversations from battlegrounds into platforms for collaborative dialogue.
Finding our shared humanity
Take, for instance, the Heineken “Worlds Apart” commercial — a poignant example of employing eunoia. In this ad, strangers with opposing views on critical issues like climate change, feminism and transgender rights are paired together to complete a task. Initially, they work together without knowing each other’s beliefs. Once the task is finished, they are shown videos revealing their differing viewpoints. They are then offered a choice: walk away or sit down, have a conversation and share a beer. Almost universally, they choose to sit down, leading to profound exchanges that highlight shared humanity over entrenched differences.
This ad resonates deeply because it taps in to a fundamental psychological truth: our perception of those with opposing views is often distorted by naïve realism. We tend to see those who disagree with us as more extreme than they really are. When we create spaces for authentic dialogue — where people can share their stories and experiences without fear — we begin to see beyond the opinions and recognize the individuals behind them. Starting from a place of eunoia inherently opens the door to these connections.
For leaders, embracing eunoia means fostering an environment where political discussions can be approached with curiosity and respect rather than fear and division. It involves recognizing that while political conversations may be uncomfortable, they also offer invaluable opportunities for growth and connection. Definitionally, eunoia is the cultivation of goodwill. By encouraging an atmosphere of understanding and empathy, leaders can turn potential sources of conflict into moments of meaningful engagement. It doesn’t need to be complicated. Here are three things you can do as a leader right now to better manage the rest of this election season.
3 actions leaders can take:
1. Establish clear guidelines for political discussions
The best time to set expectations is before the conversation even begins. Start by establishing clear guidelines that prioritize respectful dialogue and curiosity. Make it known that while diverse opinions are welcome, the objective is to gain understanding, not to convert others. This isn’t about scoring points; it’s about building bridges. To create a truly safe space, it’s critical to ensure that everyone feels comfortable expressing their views without fear of judgment or backlash. Encourage your team to listen actively, ask open-ended questions and approach every conversation with a mindset of learning rather than defending – of connecting, not conquering. When people feel safe and heard, they’re more likely to engage in meaningful dialogue that broadens perspectives rather than deepens divides.
2. Facilitate structured conversations
When political topics arise, the natural instinct might be to shy away from them — but avoiding these discussions doesn’t solve the underlying tension. Instead, lean into the conversation with structure. Implement a format like a “listening circle,” where each person has a set amount of time to share their thoughts without interruption. This format serves two purposes: it ensures that every voice is heard, and it prevents the conversation from spiraling into an unproductive debate. By structuring these discussions, you allow for a balanced exchange of ideas, reducing the likelihood of emotional escalation. The goal here isn’t to reach consensus but to ensure that diverse viewpoints are acknowledged and respected. We don’t have to agree with each other, and we are never going to change each other’s minds, so stop making that the goal; if I learn and understand where you’re coming from, and you learn and understand where I’m coming from, that’s a successful political conversation. Also, keep in mind that this should be a challenge-by-choice activity; everyone should be free to participate — or not.
3. Model eunoia in your leadership
As a leader, your actions set the tone for the entire team. If you want to cultivate eunoia — goodwill and beautiful thinking — within your team, you need to model it in your leadership. Show genuine interest in your team’s diverse perspectives, and make a concerted effort to acknowledge and validate their feelings, even if you don’t personally agree with them. This doesn’t mean compromising your own beliefs but rather demonstrating that you value the person behind the opinion. By consistently leading with empathy and respect, you create a culture where mutual understanding and trust can flourish. Your example encourages others to do the same, fostering a more inclusive and psychologically safe environment where all voices are valued.
In the end, navigating politics at work requires more than just setting rules; it demands a commitment to creating a culture where diverse perspectives are valued and respected. It’s about finding common ground amidst the clamor of differing opinions and building a workplace where dialogue leads to deeper connections rather than deeper divides. Embracing eunoia might just be the key to achieving that balance — something Aristotle understood nearly 2,500 years ago.
Opinions expressed by SmartBrief contributors are their own.
____________________________________
Take advantage of SmartBrief’s FREE email newsletters on leadership and business transformation, among the company’s more than 250 industry-focused newsletters.