In the traditional game of musical chairs, the rules are straightforward: when the music stops, someone is eliminated — one fewer chair. One more kid left standing. Round after round, the competition intensifies. Fewer and fewer winners. More and more anxiety.
That’s how school has felt for a long time, for students, for families, even for educators. It’s a game of scarcity: not enough seats in the honors classes, not enough recognition for the many ways students excel, not enough room at the top. In a system where success is narrowly defined, not everyone can earn the highest test scores, even if they’re deeply capable in other ways. As a result, many kids who cannot thrive are never given a fair chance because scarcity keeps them on the sidelines.
However, things get tense if school leaders start talking about changing the rules to open the playing field. Because once you’ve figured out how to win at musical chairs, why would you want to play a different game?
Change feels like someone’s about to steal your seat
Educators and leaders who propose new ways of doing school — competency-based learning, rethinking grades, expanding pathways to success — often encounter resistance. Sometimes it’s framed as concern for quality. Other times it’s about readiness or tradition. But often, underneath all of it, there’s fear.
Uncertainty makes us cling tighter to what we know, especially if it’s worked for us. If a student thrives in the current system, a parent might wonder, “What happens to my child in this new model?“ Will they still be seen? Celebrated? Succeed?”
Educators ask the same questions about their roles. “Will I still be respected if we shift away from the structures I’ve mastered?”
While the worries may not always be said out loud, the fear that changing the system might mean losing their seat is understandable for those used to winning.
What if the new game isn’t about fewer chairs?
But here’s the twist: no one’s removing chairs in this game.
Many school leaders working to reimagine education are trying to add them by introducing new ways to demonstrate learning, new definitions of success and new opportunities for students who’ve never felt like they belonged.
In the old model, success often meant beating someone else to the chair. But at Eastern Hancock Schools, we’re building a different game where success looks like collaboration, mastery, contribution and purpose. We’ve made room for all types of success to be measured and valued.
For instance, the superintendent and high school principal meet individually with each student to learn about their interests, strengths and goals, because the better we know our kids, the better we know how to honor their success. Our students also work side-by-side with professionals in health care, education, engineering and construction — earning credentials, gaining experience and building confidence.
That shift — from a deficit mindset to an abundance mindset — isn’t just philosophical. It’s practical. It means we can stop spending our energy sorting and ranking students and start designing learning environments where every child has a meaningful place.
Designing a game worth playing
At its best, school should feel more like a jam session than a game of musical chairs — everyone bringing their strengths and encouraged to improvise, create and connect. That doesn’t mean eliminating rigor or accountability. It means redefining them to reflect what really matters.
Change is uncomfortable. But if we lead with empathy and clarity, we can help everyone see that the future of education doesn’t have to feel like a threat. It can feel like an invitation.
So let’s ask the question: What if no one is removing chairs? What if we finally make room for everyone to sit — and to shine?
Opinions expressed by SmartBrief contributors are their own.
Subscribe to SmartBrief’s FREE email newsletters to see the latest hot topics on educational leadership in ASCD and ASCDLeaders. They’re among SmartBrief’s more than 200 industry-focused newsletters.