Leaders are told to be decisive, confident and clear, but there’s something we don’t talk about enough: What happens when they’re not?
The truth is, leaders live in uncertainty. The problem isn’t uncertainty itself; it’s the interpretation of uncertainty, the story we attach to being a leader and being uncertain.
Most leaders don’t experience uncertainty as neutral. When they don’t know something, they experience the uncertainty as “I should know,” and that’s when resistance to reality provokes an identity threat, a judgment about competence. The uncertainty shifts from a situation to who I should be as a leader. And that’s the moment where shame quietly enters.
I’ve been there myself, but I didn’t have the words to explain it at the time. Early in my career, I found myself in conversations I didn’t understand. I could feel the internal pressure rising, not from anyone in the room, but from my own expectation of who I thought I needed to be.
I didn’t say, “I’m not sure.”
I didn’t say, “I’m not clear.”
Instead, I filled the space. I talked around the issue and tried to stay credible. On the surface, it worked, but underneath, something else was happening. I wasn’t trying to solve the problem anymore; I was trying to protect myself.
Until one day, I couldn’t ignore the disconnect. I was sitting in a board meeting, listening to arguments and voting on issues I didn’t understand. Finally, I spoke up.
I said, “I’m of no value here. I don’t understand what we’re arguing about. I don’t understand what I’m voting for or against.”
There was a long silence, and then five or six people said, “Me too.”
That’s how quiet the pressure to appear certain can be. The moment uncertainty becomes personal, clarity is no longer the goal — protection is.
What neuroscience tells us
Neuroscience research from Joseph LeDoux and Lisa Feldman Barrett shows that the brain doesn’t treat uncertainty as neutral. The brain treats uncertainty as a threat. The brain prefers a bad certainty over an unknown or even potentially positive outcome. Before a leader even has a chance to think clearly, the body is already reacting.
Then comes the second layer: Shame. Brené Brown distinguishes between guilt and shame:
- Guilt says: I did something wrong
- Shame says: I am something wrong
Let’s apply this to leadership:
- “I don’t know the answer” is neutral
- “I should know the answer” is an identity threat
- “If I don’t know, I’m not competent” is an expression of shame
That leap happens fast, and often silently. And once it does, leaders stop operating from curiosity and start operating from protection.
Why it matters
Research from Amy Edmondson on psychological safety shows that even in well-intentioned cultures, leaders still feel pressure to appear certain. No one says it outright, but the message is clear: “Admit uncertainty, and you risk credibility.” So, leaders adapt. They don’t eliminate uncertainty; they hide it.
The truth is that shame distorts leadership. When uncertainty feels unsafe, leaders don’t just feel different; they lead differently. They delay decisions to avoid exposure; they shut down to input to protect their authority, and they default to control instead of conversation.
The appearance of certainty replaces the process of clarity, and that’s where execution quietly starts to unravel. The unraveling will present as a lack of accountability, but accountability can’t happen without conversations and without clarity.
Execution breaks down because the conversation that should have happened didn’t.
The one where a leader could say:
- “Here’s what we don’t know yet.”
- “Let’s think this through together.”
- “I may be missing something.”
A distinction worth noticing
Uncertainty says: “I don’t know,” while Shame says: “It’s wrong that I don’t know.” When shame is added to the current reality, it’s shame that drives the behavior.
Here’s a simple way to frame it: Uncertainty is situational, but shame is interpretive.
The purpose of leadership isn’t to eliminate uncertainty. The purpose of leadership is to remove the shame attached to the experience of uncertainty. When we let go of the shame attached to uncertainty, we can stay in the conversation long enough to create clarity through dialogue, challenge and shared thinking.
The cost of hiding uncertainty is execution risk. The signs are misalignment, delayed feedback, avoidable rework and mismanaged conflict.
As a leader, there’s a choice to make. You can choose to pretend you’re certain, or you can decide to admit it and walk through uncertainty courageously.
And execution depends on that choice.
Opinions expressed by SmartBrief contributors are their own.
____________________________________
Take advantage of SmartBrief’s FREE email newsletters on leadership and business transformation, among the company’s more than 250 industry-focused newsletters.