Every spring, teachers see something that doesn’t quite add up. A student who’s crushed it all year – raising their hand, turning in solid work, clearly getting the material – sits down for a standardized test and performs terribly. It’s particularly frustrating for the student, but also for educators who know what that student is capable of achieving.
In many cases, the issue is tied to executive function skills rather than content knowledge. Executive function refers to the set of interrelated, developmental skills that support goal-directed behavior, including emotional regulation, attention control, planning, task monitoring and follow-through. In practical terms, these are the skills students use to get started, plan their approach, hold information in mind, manage frustration, stay focused, adjust when something isn’t working and complete tasks accurately and independently.
Assessments do more than measure whether a student understands how to solve for X or knows that Abraham Lincoln was the sixteenth president of the United States. They put serious pressure on skills such as staying focused, keeping track of time, managing stress and following multi-step directions. Executive function skills do not reflect what students know, but they determine how effectively students can access and apply what they know under cognitive load. As pressure increases, even students who have been successful all year may experience breakdowns that affect performance.
Emotional regulation and test taking
Emotional regulation, an executive function skill, is often the first to weaken. Assessments can bring on frustration or a sense of pressure – self-imposed or from adult expectations. When emotions are in overdrive, cognitive systems operate less efficiently because the brain allocates resources to managing stress, leaving fewer for higher-order thinking. This means working memory becomes harder to access, making it more difficult for students to process directions, hold onto information or apply strategies they’ve practiced countless times.
As emotional load increases, task monitoring often declines. Many students move through tests focused on just finishing them rather than working carefully. They may rush through questions, skim directions or skip strategies they know well. This is cognitive overload and reflects a breakdown in skill execution under demand, not a lack of understanding or laziness.
Challenges with inhibition and self-monitoring can further interfere with performance. Some students are sidetracked by the testing environment, noticing who finishes early or reacting to classmates’ behaviors. Others become distracted, lose focus or zone out when they start to feel fatigued. These issues make it harder for students to sustain effort, particularly during longer or multi-day testing sessions.
These breakdowns in inhibition, self-monitoring and sustained attention are where the gap between knowledge and execution becomes most visible. Even when students understand the content and are familiar with test-taking strategies, they may not use those skills when cognitive load is high. As a result, assessment scores can underestimate a student’s actual understanding and ability.
What educators can do
Reframing can help students navigate this stretch of the school year. By spring, expectations often increase, not only academically, but also in terms of independence and self-direction. Revisiting the learning goals set at the start of the year allows students to see the progress they have made and recognize how their executive function skills are developing.
When teachers take time to validate growth, students are better positioned to initiate tasks independently and stay engaged with more complex or longer assignments. This can be as simple as naming specific changes educators observe – such as improved stamina, better use of strategies or increased follow-through – and connecting those gains to current expectations. Doing so helps students recognize that their skills are strengthening, even when performance feels uneven.
Testing season offers insight that goes beyond scores. Observing students during assessments can help educators determine whether challenges stem from content gaps or Executive Function demands. A student who rushes through directions, loses focus toward the end of a test or performs unevenly across testing days may be signaling difficulty with regulation, monitoring or endurance rather than misunderstanding the material. Recognizing these patterns can change how we respond. Instead of reteaching content they already know, we might focus on building stamina or practicing strategies under pressure.
Ultimately, the testing season serves as a stress test for executive function skills. When educators pay attention to factors outside of performance and focus on behaviors, strategies, and regulation, they can get a clearer picture of what each student needs. And that’s what helps them grow, not just for the next test, but for everything that comes next.
Opinions expressed by SmartBrief contributors are their own.
Subscribe to SmartBrief’s FREE email newsletters to see the latest hot topics on educational leadership in ASCD and ASCDLeaders. They’re among SmartBrief’s more than 200 industry-focused newsletters.