Attention has never been cheaper to buy on social, but it has never been harder to hold.
Audiences increasingly experience social platforms as an endless stream of algorithmically selected content. They consume more than ever while engaging and trusting it less. At the same time, AI-generated “slop” is only adding to that feeling of saturation, making it harder for brands to stand out through volume alone.
As a result, many of the people brands actually want to influence are spending more time in smaller, interest-led social media communities away from the noise. Reddit threads. Discord servers. Facebook groups. Subcultures with their own language, humor and social rules. Places where recommendations are still of value, and credibility is earned.
For brands entering these spaces, trust is key. It is not enough to be seen; you need to act more like a “villager.”
What it means to be a “villager”
To be a villager means becoming a functioning member of a community rather than a brand that attempts to dominate it.
Too many brands still enter online circles like advertisers entering rented media space: They arrive loudly, lead with messaging and expect attention simply because they are already well known elsewhere.
But these communities do not operate like traditional audiences. They function like social ecosystems where credibility and acceptance come from participation, as opposed to recognition. People can see and still ignore a brand.
So the challenge is not just how a brand shows up, but whether it can offer value to users in that environment at all.
Take Coach. The brand launched &Coach, an always-on storytelling platform developed with Generation Z creatives across art, fashion, film and digital culture. Instead of imposing a fixed luxury narrative, the platform is built around shared authorship, creators and personal storytelling. By co-authoring with the community rather than extracting from it, Coach signaled that it was there to provide a platform for voices already present rather than to advertise.
It meant that the brand was welcomed into that community rather than viewed as an outsider. Because if you go in, trying to grab the attention, then you are going to be spotted and potentially called out very early. And then you are facing an uphill battle.
And take Lego and its relationship with BrickLink. BrickLink began as a fan-run marketplace and discussion platform where Lego enthusiasts traded pieces, shared custom builds and built their own ecosystem long before Lego acquired it in 2019. Rather than reshaping it into a heavily branded environment, Lego committed to maintaining its existing marketplace and community-driven structure, allowing the behaviors fans already valued to continue.
The art of “lurking”
But even before a brand participates, it needs to understand the system it is entering.
Brands often misread the space. Participation is actually not enough on its own to be a villager. In reality, each digital ecosystem already has its own cultural signals for credibility. Shared interests, identities and behaviors.
This is why lurking in the background becomes key. It allows brands to understand what’s rewarded in the community first, so they don’t overstep the mark too early.
That can feel uncomfortable for brands conditioned to move quickly. Most social platforms train brands to act aggressively by reacting instantly, chasing trends and maximizing visibility at all costs. But these social media communities reward being slower and more observational.
Before participating, brands need to understand how meaning is created in that environment. Social listening is therefore key, but only if used to its full potential.
Brands often limit their thinking of social listening as a way to track mentions or sentiment analysis. When looking at communities, there is a more sophisticated purpose. It helps brands understand how influence spreads, who the members are, who have credibility and what behaviors are rewarded (or rejected).
Normal users already do this instinctively when entering new online spaces. They observe first, understand the etiquette and work out whether this is ”‘their people,” before actively participating.
Brands should adopt the same behavior so they don’t stick out or are dismissed.
The brands that fail in social media communities are often the ones that misinterpret cultural signals early, and,because these spaces tend to be highly self-policing, those mistakes are difficult to recover from once trust is lost.
Play long games, reap better rewards
Think of a community relationship like an influencer relationship at its best. It’s an opportunity for a brand to become more familiar with the right people, rather than treating every interaction as a transaction.
But that familiarity does not come from repetition alone. It builds through repeated value that the community recognizes over time.
Brands cannot expect to enter a community and instantly earn credibility. They should resist the temptation to over-commercialize their presence too early, because people can immediately sense when participation feels forced. The community rewards familiarity and consistent contribution over spectacle.
The longer a brand participates without constantly demanding attention back, the more the brand becomes cemented as a villager, and the more the community starts to offer its own microinfluencers to naturally advocate for it. The voices that carry weight because they are already embedded in the culture.
Look at Chobani’s “Feed the Dream” initiative. Rather than settling for the hollow title of “official nutrition partner,” the brand shifted its focus to become a genuine supporter of grassroots soccer. It funded local clubs, nourishing the parents, coaches and mentors who keep the “soccer dream” alive. It inserted itself into the fabric of the community’s daily life, supporting the conditions that allow the “dream” to exist in the first place.
Although these spaces are niche, broader social feeds are becoming more saturated and harder to trust. People are placing more weight on tightly defined environments where recommendations are still socially validated and not algorithmically pushed.
In many ways, social media communities are now acting as discovery engines. Ideas emerge within them, migrate out of their niche and across platforms, influencing broader conversations and decisions as they do so. Understanding how those “signals” across the social universe is becoming just as important as understanding what happens inside a single platform.
Brands need to think of these influential online spaces as campfires, not a stage to perform on. People gather around shared interests, exchange recommendations and build trust over time.
Try to dominate and perform to them, and you will find yourself on the outside in the dark. But if brands approach as a “villager,” willing to contribute before asking for anything in return, they will earn their place around the fire.
And in an online world, where AI and algorithms dominate, being a trusted “villager” can be the difference maker.
Opinions expressed by SmartBrief contributors are their own.
____________________________________
If you liked this article, sign up for the SmartBrief Marketing Pulse, a daily look at the latest in shifts and performance data for marketers.