Well, often, everything. I love a good backstory, and that’s why I enjoyed the Campaign US story of agencies sharing the reasoning behind their names. From something as straightforward as Cactus (inspired by a desert drive) to something personal and a bit deeper, like Axe + Saw (inspired by Bob Marley’s “Small Axe”), it can be fascinating to know a company’s origin story.
It also got me thinking about how the branding behind company names has changed over the decades. From Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn to simply BBDO and Turner Network Television to simply TNT, founders wanted their name on the door. But then again, no one really likes a long name, so abbreviations eventually became the rule (hello, IBM!).
Of late, business names are more descriptive and eye-catching. Look at Nature Made, Puma, Two Men and a Truck and The Container Store.
The rise of tech companies brought a new twist for the branding behind company names, with many being (at least to me) esoteric or being made from the combination of two words to make a new one. (Looking at you Nvidia and Anthropic, among others.)
So this leads me back to the question: What’s in a name?
Ultimately, a company’s name should be tied to branding — What you want to convey, positioning, consumers’ reactions, being understood and (positively) recognized, should all be considered. Often, it’s not an easy process, but the payoff — if done right — is that tight consumer connection that every company craves.
Got a take on company names? I’d love to read it. And, you might see your insights in a SmartBrief newsletter.
If you liked this article, sign up for the SmartBrief Marketing Pulse, a daily look at the latest in shifts and performance data for marketers.